A few ideas on “How Forecast Reliability Decays — and How to Use It to Your Advantage.”

In the world of investing, we all want to know: how far into the future can we trust our forecasts? Whether it’s market movements, volatility, or macroeconomic predictions, the ability to foresee what’s coming is a valuable tool for any investor.

But forecasting isn’t static.  Dynamical systems weigh. Over time, predictive models lose reliability. The future is not equally trustworthy when beheld at all distances — and the key to managing risk lies in understanding how and when our forecast trust begins to decay.

In this exclusive premium article, we propose a groundbreaking model for quantifying forecast decay in financial markets — and explore how to use this knowledge to make smarter investment decisions.

Why This Matters to You:

Predictive Confidence Isn’t the Same Over Time: Most investors assume that market predictions decline linearly. But forecast trust decays exponentially over time — and this affects every investor. Understanding when decay sets in can help you make better, more informed decisions. We cover:

• How forecast trust decays and how to measure its “half-life” using simple, practical models.
• How to recognize when a forecast is losing credibility and how to adjust your positions accordingly.
• Insights into short-term vs. long-term forecasting, and why timing is everything.
• Strategic, actionable insights that help you stay ahead of volatility and market shocks.

Ready to Take Your Forecasting to the Next Level?  Gain access to this article and more by supporting Peoplenomics for just $40/year.

More for Subscribers||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Friday we saw exactly what we anticipated — a “split decision” in the markets. One model suggests we may have a bit more upside compression ahead, possibly even one final squeeze before a larger turn. Another clock is ticking toward a potential unwind. The key right now isn’t prediction — it’s instrumentation. When markets compress, they tend to expand. The question is direction and timing, and this is one of those weeks where paying attention matters more than being certain.

At the same time, we’re watching another kind of compression — in weather patterns. Low snowpack reports across the West and early burn activity here in Texas are raising quiet questions about drought risk heading into spring. None of this guarantees trouble, but taken together, these signals nudge probabilities. Markets, climate, and policy cycles all tend to move in waves. The disciplined approach is the same in each case: recognize patterns early and reduce exposure to surprise.

Preparation beats prediction. Whether it’s managing portfolio risk or installing a swamp cooler ahead of a hotter-than-usual season, the goal is simple: measure, adapt, and stay ahead of the curve. The future rarely announces itself loudly at first — it whispers. The job is to hear it before it starts shouting.

More for Subscribers||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Maybe, But Education Might Not Be the Answer Anymore

In this week’s Peoplenomics we delve into two pressing questions:

State-Variance Extremes: The Key to Market Moves

Our custom State-Variance Extremes model has been helping us stay ahead of the market’s movements, with a notable 11% gain in the first two months this year. We take a deep dive into how this model is working—combining short-term fluctuations with long-term patterns to predict upcoming market trends. This method looks promising for continued upside potential, but as always, we advise caution in these experimental trades.

Can Legacy Education Systems Still Save the World?

As global systems seem to grow more fragile, the reflexive answer to societal challenges is often: better education will save us. But what if the problem isn’t a lack of knowledge, but the structure of our education systems themselves? In today’s column, we ask whether it’s already too late for legacy education systems to play the role of societal savior. Could individual, systems-based thinking be the real solution as we approach an era of greater complexity?

For a complete look at these analyses, plus an insider story from the airline industry on how small decisions (like the weight of aircraft paint) can impact fuel efficiency, don’t miss today’s Peoplenomics.

More for Subscribers||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Most people think nothing much is happening right now. Markets are drifting, headlines are recycled, and the sense of urgency feels muted. That’s usually when I start paying closer attention. Because the biggest moves rarely begin with noise — they begin with compression. Right now, a series of structural indicators suggest we’re coiled inside a tightening range. That doesn’t guarantee direction. But it does suggest expansion is coming.

At the same time, the bigger forces shaping the next decade are quietly accelerating. Insurance markets are thinning. Commercial real estate debt is rolling forward into a tightening credit cycle. Wage growth is slowing while AI is beginning to reallocate routine thinking across entire industries. None of this screams “crisis.” But together, it forms a pattern — one that rewards people who model the most likely future early, instead of reacting to it late.

Inside, we’re not trading headlines. We’re trading structure — and adjusting capital, skills, and generational plans accordingly. Compression never lasts forever. The only real question is whether you’re positioned before the expansion begins.

More for Subscribers||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

The future often reduces to a couple of numbers. This week, it’s the delayed Jobs report and Friday’s CPI. With soft ADP data and elevated Challenger job cuts in the backdrop, the official BLS print carries extra weight. Depending on how it lands, we could see the classic “buy the rumor, sell the news” dynamic around inflation — or its mirror image. We’re watching, not predicting.

Subscribers today get a substantial long-wave economics deep dive in “Beyond the Kidnapping Replay.” It revisits historical rhyme patterns — trust erosion, inflation pressure, crypto ruptures, corruption markers, overlapping geopolitical stressors — and places them in a state-extremes market framework. It’s long, deliberately so, and meant to provoke structured thinking rather than knee-jerk reaction.

More for Subscribers||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

It’s Super Bowl weekend — but instead of hype and halftime noise, today’s Peoplenomics report takes a hard look at something few people ever question: why taxpayers are still paying for private sports empires.

In Frank’s Weekend: The High Cost of Private Sports, we trace the hidden financial machinery behind stadiums, bonds, and “public-private partnerships,” and explain why these projects almost never pay for themselves — no matter how they’re sold to voters.

This isn’t a rant about sports. It’s an accounting story. One that reaches back to a little-known legal fight in Seattle in the early 1970s and runs straight through today’s ballooning public debt, rising living costs, and misplaced priorities. Along the way, we separate civic pride from fiscal reality and show how entertainment quietly became one of the most reliable ways to socialize risk while privatizing profit.

Subscribers also get this week’s ChartPack, where we lay out how current market conditions, short-term volatility, and state-variance extremes may shape trading in the days ahead — including why a brief pullback could give way to a sharper rally. If you want the full analysis, the historical context, and the market framework that goes with it, log in or subscribe below.

Or, go pop a cold one and keep pretending.

More for Subscribers||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

What Matters More Than the Noise

Two signals today deserve serious attention — and neither has much to do with the shouting matches dominating cable news. First, the jobs picture. ADP’s January number came in at just 22,000 jobs created nationwide, a figure that borders on stall speed. Normally, we’d look to follow-on data to confirm or refute that weakness. But with the Labor Department’s JOLTS system offline due to suspended federal services, one of the economy’s most important “early warning gauges” simply went dark. When employment signals vanish, businesses don’t lean in — they pull back. Hiring freezes, delayed raises, and postponed expansion plans are how uncertainty shows up in real life.

Under the MSM Noise Floor

Second, while media attention remains locked on Trump, Epstein, and ICE protests in distant cities, the pressures most households feel are far closer to home. Rising insurance premiums, creeping property taxes, and quietly deteriorating infrastructure don’t trend on social media — but they shape daily decisions and long-term stability. When reliable economic data disappears at the same time local costs continue rising, risk compounds silently. That’s the counterpoint worth keeping in mind: national drama sells clicks, but local economics decides outcomes. For now, the practical response remains simple — chop wood, carry water, and watch the signals that actually move lives, not just headlines.

More for Subscribers||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Most people spend their weekends drowning in headlines that won’t matter by Monday — while missing the few signals that will. This week’s Peoplenomics cuts through the noise with a simple question: what actually changes people’s lives in the next 72 hours? Weather, shutdown mechanics, markets, supply chains, and geopolitical risk all get ranked — not by outrage value, but by real-world impact.

What makes this different is the method. Instead of chasing narratives, we run a disciplined scan, then stress-test it with human judgment. The result isn’t prediction theater — it’s orientation. You’ll see why markets can look calm while quietly losing their informational compass, how partial shutdowns degrade data quality without triggering alarms, and why “nothing happening” is often the most dangerous condition of all.

The companion ChartPack takes it further, showing where today’s market rhythms rhyme with past turning points — and where they don’t. It’s not advice. It’s situational awareness for people who prefer thinking over reacting. If you like knowing why something matters before everyone else suddenly notices, this is one worth clicking — and keeping.

More for Subscribers||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Most investors look at a rising market and assume progress. But on a Fed Day, that assumption can be expensive. Price moves for three very different reasons: real business improvement, currency dilution, and story momentum. If you don’t separate them, you end up celebrating gains that are really just your money getting weaker. Today’s column tackles a simple but uncomfortable question: are stocks rising because American companies are genuinely producing more and better—or because the dollar buys less of everything that matters?

Using a civilian-grade calculation—no PhD, no quants, no CPI fairy dust—we strip market gains into hard-constraint terms the Fed can’t print and China can’t fake overnight. When you do that, something sobering shows up. Since pre-COVID, the market’s headline gains look impressive. In real purchasing-power terms, they’re far less heroic. Some genuine productivity exists. But a large share of what feels like “growth” turns out to be forced defense against monetary dilution.

The punchline matters for today’s rate decision, today’s ChartPack, and the next several years of investing. Roughly half of what many investors think is wealth creation may simply be money illusion—priced in as if it were permanent. That doesn’t make the market wrong. It makes situational awareness essential. If you want to know whether you’re getting richer—or just running harder to stay in place—this morning’s Peoplenomics lays out a framework worth stealing.

So is our view about the future on knowledge as Elaine and I face one of the hardest decisions seniors make:  What to do with all our beloved books?

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

I’ve been wrsiting about prepping for what? 25+ years?

And with all that experience, I would have thought that I’d “seen it all.”

But that was before the Storm Fern this weekend.  It funny, and serious, but most importantly profound.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

If the headline isn’t a giveaway as to what we cover today?

You need more coffee – lots of it.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Going into the long weekend, I’ve been chewing on what may be the most important investment question we ever face, and it has nothing to do with stocks. It’s the question of where we put our remaining attention, energy, and clarity as the calendar insists on moving forward. There’s a “retirement” story most people tell themselves, but there’s also a quieter reality: aging isn’t just years, it’s motion. Some folks keep moving, building, learning, and adapting. Others default to the couch and the Cyclops. The difference shows up fast.

Markets are closed Monday, but the world is not. We’re heading into a week where headlines can matter more than models, and where the next slice of GDP data will give us a fresh read on whether money is actually turning over or just pooling in place. I’ll keep today’s column light on the “spoilers,” but the setup is straightforward: news flow is likely to drive, and the week ahead looks like one of those moments where timing, sentiment, and the consumer’s willingness to spend may tell us more than any single number. ChartPack is posted for subscribers. Use the holiday to get organized, pick a project, and come back Tuesday ready to think clearly.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

America hasn’t become the Duchy of Grand Fenwick overnight. We’re not there yet, and we probably can’t get there for another five or ten years. But the uncomfortable truth is that American hegemony, both financial and cultural, is now openly negotiable. Silver topped $90 overnight.

A reserve currency doesn’t lose leadership because another nation makes a speech. It loses leadership because the old anchor stops doing three jobs at once: settling trade, warehousing savings, and financing wars without blowing credibility to pieces. The shift shows up first in the plumbing — what gets invoiced in what, what central banks hoard, what is treated as “risk-free,” and which rails get used when things get tense.

That’s why the WWII handoff from sterling to the dollar matters. Britain entered the 1900s with empire trade networks and London finance as the global default. Then two world wars did the damage: gold drained, assets sold, debts piled up. Meanwhile the U.S. became the arsenal, the lender, and the factory floor. By war’s end, America held disproportionate gold, ran the most productive industrial base on Earth, and had the deep markets required for reserve currency status. Bretton Woods didn’t create dominance; it formalized a shift already forced by war math.

Now the “quiet tells” are back in view. In On the Waterfront: Change Noted, you’re not chasing headlines — you’re looking at slow-speed giants: port cargo numbers and the suggestion of meaningful declines up and down the West Coast, framed as a systems shift more than a cyclical wobble.

In the ChartPack, the frame is a “Global Gap or Dollar Faller?” moment: readers shifting from stock-picking to asset-class questions, and metals still on their “moonward journey.”

Those aren’t proof of an imminent collapse. They’re evidence of a world beginning to price alternatives and reduce single-point dependence.

Which is where the practical side comes in. Your CWL doctrine isn’t politics; it’s continuity-of-life: remain solvent, healthy, mobile, and optional while systems misalign. Treat CWL as a systems failure mode, with the objective being non-participation by default.

That same operational mindset applies to currency transitions: they don’t announce themselves with sirens. They arrive as reliability breaks, optionality narrows, and the default stops being the cheapest choice.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||